Storm Watch 2010 – This Time It’s Personal

Below is a copy of the storm alert that was distributed by U.S. Geological Survey/Pacific Science Center. You gotta love a guy who closes a lengthy memo like this with, “In short,” (thanks to Karineh for the attachment):

“Currently, the strong El Nino is reaching its peak in the Eastern Pacific, and now finally appears to be exerting an influence on our weather.

The strong jet has been apparent for quite some time out over the open water, but the persistent block had prevented it from reaching the coast.  Now that the block has dissolved completely, a 200+ kt jet is barreling towards us.

Multiple large and powerful storm systems are expected to slam into CA from the west and northwest over the coming two weeks, all riding this extremely powerful jet stream directly into the state.

The jet will itself provide tremendous dynamic lift, in addition to directing numerous disturbances right at the state and supplying them with an ample oceanic moisture source. The jet will be at quite a low latitude over much of the Pacific, so these storms will be quite cold, at least initially.

Very heavy rainfall and strong to potentially very strong winds will impact the lower elevations beginning late Sunday and continuing through at least the following Sunday.  This will be the case for the entire state, from (and south of) the Mexican border all the way up to Oregon.  Above 3000-4000 feet, precipitation will be all snow, and since temperatures will be unusually cold for a precipitation event of this magnitude, a truly prodigious amount of snowfall is likely to occur in the mountains, possibly measured in the tens of feet in the Sierra after it’s all said and done.  But there’s a big and rather threatening caveat to that (discussed below). Individual storm events are going to be hard to time for at least few more days, since this jet is just about as powerful as they come (on this planet, anyway). Between this Sunday and the following Sunday, I expect categorical statewide rainfall totals in excess of 3-4 inches. That is likely to be a huge underestimate for most areas. Much of NorCal is likely to see 5-10 inches in the lowlands, with 10-20 inches in orographically-favored areas. Most of SoCal will see 3-6 inches at lower elevations, with perhaps triple that amount in favored areas.

This is where things get even more interesting, though. The models are virtually unanimous in “reloading” the powerful jet stream and forming an additional persistent kink 2000-3000 miles to our southwest after next Sunday. This is a truly ominous pattern, because it implies the potential for a strong Pineapple-type connection to develop. Indeed, the 12z GFS now shows copious warm rains falling between days 12 and 16 across the entire state. Normally, such as scenario out beyond day seven would be dubious at best. Since the models are in such truly remarkable agreement, however, and because of the extremely high potential impact of such an event, it’s worth mentioning now. Since there will be a massive volume of freshly-fallen snow (even at relatively low elevations between 3000-5000 feet), even a moderately warm storm event would cause very serious flooding.  This situation will have to be monitored closely. Even if the tropical connection does not develop, expected rains in the coming 7-10 days will likely be sufficient to cause flooding in and of themselves (even in spite of dry antecedent conditions).

In addition to very heavy precipitation, powerful winds may result from very steep pressure gradients associated with the large and deep low pressure centers expect ed to begin approaching the coast by early next week. Though it’s not clear at the moment just how powerful these winds may be, there is certainly the potential for a widespread damaging wind event at some point, and the high Sierra peaks are likely to see gusts in the 100-200 mph range (since the 200kt jet at 200-300 mb will essentially run directly into the mountains at some point). The details of this will have to be hashed out as the event(s) draw closer.

In short, the next 2-3 weeks (at least) are likely to be more active across California than any other 2-3 week period in recent memory. The potential exists for a dangerous flood scenario to arise at some point during this interval, especially with the possibility of a heavy rain-on-snow event during late week 2. In some parts of Southern California, a whole season’s worth of rain could fall over the course of 5-10 days. This is likely to be a rather memorable event. Stay tuned…”

Samuel Y. Johnson
Western Coastal and Marine Geology
U.S. Geological Survey

11 thoughts on “Storm Watch 2010 – This Time It’s Personal”

  1. For a lot of people it is too late to get their roofs fixed. But I am sure the umbrella folks that sell umbrellas are ready.

    For those people who park in floodable areas,they better park in higher grounds.

  2. I hope the rain falls further north to help our water shortage issues. Also hope that this is the “drought buster” that the entire set of western states needs.

    This may be an active system coming our way. I wonder if it will be as powerful as the storms of early ’05 where my area had 2o inches of rain in a two week period of January.

    I do look forward to enough rain so the San Gabriel river runs again on its own like it did in 05 and 06 non-stop.

  3. This is sounding like the El Nino from back in the day when Northridge and the Sepulveda Dam got completely flooded. Back in 91-ish?

    I was young but I distinctly remember driving out to Northridge to pick up my uncle, and as we passed over an off shoot of the LA River I said “It looks like it’s going to go over the sides.” Then it did.

  4. Please note that Samuel Y. Johnson is a geologist whose research centers on tectonics and sea floor mapping. Why in heaven’s name a geologist would be issuing weather alerts is beyond me.

    The National Weather Service does indeed predict some rather heavy weather and gusty winds in the upcoming week, but so what? It’s winter in southern California.


  5. This winter has been the coldest in 100 years. What happened to global warming? It is all a scam.

  6. What happened to global warming?

    There’s a reason it’s called “global warming” and not “local warming”.


    As you add energy (warmth) to a system, it’s typical for extremes to get more extreme. The added energy drives system oscillations to higher peaks – and lower valleys. It’s like pushing on a swing – even if all your pushes are in the forward direction, the swing still swings higher both forward and backward.

    The El Niño/La Niña cycle is an oscillation driven by warming of the ocean surface. When the ocean surface warms, that evaporates more water, which makes bigger, denser, moister clouds, which makes wetter colder storm systems. More ocean-surface warming = more and wetter rainstorms.

    But it’s still an oscillation. That means the drought years are drier and hotter (just as we’ve seen the last several years) and the rainy years are wetter and colder.

    Hot things get hotter, cold things get colder, dry things get drier, wet things get wetter.

    Extremes become more extreme.

    One cold year doesn’t make a pattern – and the pattern isn’t “warmer everywhere” it’s “more energetic weather systems everywhere.”

    That means both warmer and colder. Sometimes in the same place.

    And that’s exactly what climate scientists have been telling us to expect from global warming. Far from exposing global warming as “a scam”, it’s actually evidence in support of global warming.

Comments are closed.