<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which came first?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogging.la/2009/05/29/which-came-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogging.la/2009/05/29/which-came-first/</link>
	<description>Lizard people dude. Seriously.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: benh57</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2009/05/29/which-came-first/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>benh57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 07:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/?p=28619#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>I believe hachronn is correct. They appear to be trying to subvert the law here. I think the goal is to prevent shady repair shops from &#039;failing&#039; vehicles then offering to repair them.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe hachronn is correct. They appear to be trying to subvert the law here. I think the goal is to prevent shady repair shops from &#8216;failing&#8217; vehicles then offering to repair them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hachronn</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2009/05/29/which-came-first/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>hachronn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/?p=28619#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s probably not as cut-throat as it may appear on the surface.  Despite the fact that they can inspect any vehicle requiring a smog inspection; as a &quot;Test Only&quot; station, City Smog is legally prohibited from diagnosing and repairing vehicles.  On the other hand; as a &quot;Test and Repair Station&quot;, Smog City can&#039;t inspect vehicles that were directed to a &quot;Test Only&quot; station, but they could repair vehicles that failed next door at City Smog.  Of course, they can&#039;t legally refer customers to each other, but I have a hunch they&#039;re both benefiting from proximity.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably not as cut-throat as it may appear on the surface.  Despite the fact that they can inspect any vehicle requiring a smog inspection; as a &#8220;Test Only&#8221; station, City Smog is legally prohibited from diagnosing and repairing vehicles.  On the other hand; as a &#8220;Test and Repair Station&#8221;, Smog City can&#8217;t inspect vehicles that were directed to a &#8220;Test Only&#8221; station, but they could repair vehicles that failed next door at City Smog.  Of course, they can&#8217;t legally refer customers to each other, but I have a hunch they&#8217;re both benefiting from proximity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucinda Michele</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2009/05/29/which-came-first/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucinda Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/?p=28619#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>That is awesome.   :)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is awesome.   :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

