Comments on: Prop 8 ruling expected as soon as tomorrow http://blogging.la/2009/05/20/prop-8-ruling-expected-as-soon-as-tomorrow/ Lizard people dude. Seriously. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:54:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Dave Share http://blogging.la/2009/05/20/prop-8-ruling-expected-as-soon-as-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-44351 Dave Share Fri, 22 May 2009 17:13:11 +0000 http://la.metblogs.com/?p=28205#comment-44351 I just threw up in my mouth a little. I just threw up in my mouth a little.

]]> By: Annika Barranti http://blogging.la/2009/05/20/prop-8-ruling-expected-as-soon-as-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-44350 Annika Barranti Wed, 20 May 2009 22:11:19 +0000 http://la.metblogs.com/?p=28205#comment-44350 And now that I think about it, there is nothing stopping gay employees of small businesses from entering into straight marriages. I mean, nothing legal. And now that I think about it, there is nothing stopping gay employees of small businesses from entering into straight marriages. I mean, nothing legal.

]]> By: Matt Mason http://blogging.la/2009/05/20/prop-8-ruling-expected-as-soon-as-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-44349 Matt Mason Wed, 20 May 2009 21:02:42 +0000 http://la.metblogs.com/?p=28205#comment-44349 As Annika points out, under Michael Steele's logic (now that's an oxymoron), all marriages should be opposed. As Annika points out, under Michael Steele’s logic (now that’s an oxymoron), all marriages should be opposed.

]]> By: Matt Mason http://blogging.la/2009/05/20/prop-8-ruling-expected-as-soon-as-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-44348 Matt Mason Wed, 20 May 2009 20:59:58 +0000 http://la.metblogs.com/?p=28205#comment-44348 That video is a horribly shameful and inappropriate exploitation of children for political purposes. That video is a horribly shameful and inappropriate exploitation of children for political purposes.

]]> By: Annika Barranti http://blogging.la/2009/05/20/prop-8-ruling-expected-as-soon-as-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-44347 Annika Barranti Wed, 20 May 2009 20:44:05 +0000 http://la.metblogs.com/?p=28205#comment-44347 I would be furious if my children learned about equality in school, because it would mean they hadn't been listening to me their entire lives up to that moment. And Markland, I adore Steele's argument, since it totally ignores the fact that straight employees of small businesses could get married ANY TIME. I would be furious if my children learned about equality in school, because it would mean they hadn’t been listening to me their entire lives up to that moment.

And Markland, I adore Steele’s argument, since it totally ignores the fact that straight employees of small businesses could get married ANY TIME.

]]> By: David Markland http://blogging.la/2009/05/20/prop-8-ruling-expected-as-soon-as-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-44346 David Markland Wed, 20 May 2009 19:59:32 +0000 http://la.metblogs.com/?p=28205#comment-44346 I'm more impressed by Michael Steele's argument that gay marriage should be opposed because it will cost small businesses more money, since health benefits will then need to be shared between partners. So, he's not really against gay men living with each other, he's just opposed to them staying healthy. I’m more impressed by Michael Steele’s argument that gay marriage should be opposed because it will cost small businesses more money, since health benefits will then need to be shared between partners. So, he’s not really against gay men living with each other, he’s just opposed to them staying healthy.

]]> By: frazgo http://blogging.la/2009/05/20/prop-8-ruling-expected-as-soon-as-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-44345 frazgo Wed, 20 May 2009 19:15:44 +0000 http://la.metblogs.com/?p=28205#comment-44345 I just heard from the courage campaign that it will likely be next week. The longer this takes for a decision the more I become worried. Will the intent of the constitution to not limit freedoms over-ride the will of the people is the argument at hand. My hope is they reaffirm their decision on the constitutional grounds of not limiting freedoms. I just heard from the courage campaign that it will likely be next week. The longer this takes for a decision the more I become worried. Will the intent of the constitution to not limit freedoms over-ride the will of the people is the argument at hand. My hope is they reaffirm their decision on the constitutional grounds of not limiting freedoms.

]]>