<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Inspires Roger Deakins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogging.la/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/</link>
	<description>Lizard people dude. Seriously.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: elzed</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/comment-page-1/#comment-52722</link>
		<dc:creator>elzed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/#comment-52722</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. Thanks for the links.

And thanks again, Cutter, for posting this in the first place. I was there last night thanks to you. Deakins&#039; comments about Melville being closer to neorealism than to film noir gave me something new to think about and appreciate.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. Thanks for the links.</p>
<p>And thanks again, Cutter, for posting this in the first place. I was there last night thanks to you. Deakins&#8217; comments about Melville being closer to neorealism than to film noir gave me something new to think about and appreciate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutter</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/comment-page-1/#comment-52721</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/#comment-52721</guid>
		<description>P, thanks for the links! i&#039;m seeing the movie tonight at the arclight in hollywood.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P, thanks for the links! i&#8217;m seeing the movie tonight at the arclight in hollywood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/comment-page-1/#comment-52720</link>
		<dc:creator>p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/#comment-52720</guid>
		<description>Deakins was awesome.  As was the film.

Elzed -
&lt;a href=&quot;http://digitalcontentproducer.com/mil/features/video_oldfashioned_filmmaking/index2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://digitalcontentproducer.com/mil/features/video_oldfashioned_filmmaking/index2.html&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ascmag.com/magazine_dynamic/January2008/ThereWillBeBlood/page2.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ascmag.com/magazine_dynamic/January2008/ThereWillBeBlood/page2.php&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deakins was awesome.  As was the film.</p>
<p>Elzed -<br />
<a href="http://digitalcontentproducer.com/mil/features/video_oldfashioned_filmmaking/index2.html" rel="nofollow">http://digitalcontentproducer.com/mil/features/video_oldfashioned_filmmaking/index2.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ascmag.com/magazine_dynamic/January2008/ThereWillBeBlood/page2.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.ascmag.com/magazine_dynamic/January2008/ThereWillBeBlood/page2.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elzed</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/comment-page-1/#comment-52719</link>
		<dc:creator>elzed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/#comment-52719</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting tidbit, Cutter. Have you heard/read anything about Anderson&#039;s POV on this? If so can you point me in that direction?

Thanks!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting tidbit, Cutter. Have you heard/read anything about Anderson&#8217;s POV on this? If so can you point me in that direction?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cutter</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/comment-page-1/#comment-52718</link>
		<dc:creator>cutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/#comment-52718</guid>
		<description>i saw no country for old men, but not assassination or twbb. i&#039;m most interested in twbb because it is probably one of the last (if not THE last) of the big studio films to go through a completely photochemical post process (no digital intermediate), and also because everyone who&#039;s seen it has raved about the cinematography.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i saw no country for old men, but not assassination or twbb. i&#8217;m most interested in twbb because it is probably one of the last (if not THE last) of the big studio films to go through a completely photochemical post process (no digital intermediate), and also because everyone who&#8217;s seen it has raved about the cinematography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodger Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/comment-page-1/#comment-52717</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodger Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/#comment-52717</guid>
		<description>Deakins is phenomenal, reminds me of the work of the great Nestor Almendros. And, yes, the double nomination, unfortunately, cancelled him out come voting time.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deakins is phenomenal, reminds me of the work of the great Nestor Almendros. And, yes, the double nomination, unfortunately, cancelled him out come voting time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Markland</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/comment-page-1/#comment-52716</link>
		<dc:creator>David Markland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/#comment-52716</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with P on this. All of the movies photography was brilliant and worked, but No Country had a stunning range of visuals going on (vs. TWBB&#039;s mostly one note feel for the entire film).

But all the more reason to go and see Deakins talk.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with P on this. All of the movies photography was brilliant and worked, but No Country had a stunning range of visuals going on (vs. TWBB&#8217;s mostly one note feel for the entire film).</p>
<p>But all the more reason to go and see Deakins talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/comment-page-1/#comment-52715</link>
		<dc:creator>p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/26/what-inspires-roger-deakins/#comment-52715</guid>
		<description>Wait, so you have not seen TWBB?

Did you even see Assassination of Jesse James (one of the most breathtakingly gorgeous films) or No Country?  In a well-projected theatre?

How can you say he lost &quot;deservedly so&quot; based on someone else&#039;s opinion?

Deakins split his own votes, which was predicted by about anyone who knows anything.  The Oscars are a joke, and even Elswit, as great as he is, acknowledged that in the press room.

In my opinion, Jesse James and No Country were far more interesting looking than TWBB (and I have seen them all multiple times).

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, so you have not seen TWBB?</p>
<p>Did you even see Assassination of Jesse James (one of the most breathtakingly gorgeous films) or No Country?  In a well-projected theatre?</p>
<p>How can you say he lost &#8220;deservedly so&#8221; based on someone else&#8217;s opinion?</p>
<p>Deakins split his own votes, which was predicted by about anyone who knows anything.  The Oscars are a joke, and even Elswit, as great as he is, acknowledged that in the press room.</p>
<p>In my opinion, Jesse James and No Country were far more interesting looking than TWBB (and I have seen them all multiple times).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

