<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City Council Takes Action!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogging.la/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/</link>
	<description>Lizard people dude. Seriously.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Burns</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/comment-page-1/#comment-61182</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/#comment-61182</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see the members of City Council spayed or neutered.  What are we paying these people for?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see the members of City Council spayed or neutered.  What are we paying these people for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5000!</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/comment-page-1/#comment-61181</link>
		<dc:creator>5000!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/#comment-61181</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;our esteemed Los Angeles City Council has finally tackled the issue that we Angelenos have been begging them to address since . . . never.&lt;/em&gt;

You&#039;re absolutely entitled to disagree with the measure, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s demonstrates much familiarity with the debate to make it out to be non-issue. While it might not have been on your radar, there&#039;s a sizable portion of the population to whom this is a very important concern. Me, for example. In fact, I&#039;d place it above graffiti abatement on my list of priorities. Considering I&#039;m the type of person that drives around the neighborhood noting addresses to file graffiti removal requests for, I think that&#039;s saying something.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>our esteemed Los Angeles City Council has finally tackled the issue that we Angelenos have been begging them to address since . . . never.</em></p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely entitled to disagree with the measure, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s demonstrates much familiarity with the debate to make it out to be non-issue. While it might not have been on your radar, there&#8217;s a sizable portion of the population to whom this is a very important concern. Me, for example. In fact, I&#8217;d place it above graffiti abatement on my list of priorities. Considering I&#8217;m the type of person that drives around the neighborhood noting addresses to file graffiti removal requests for, I think that&#8217;s saying something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/comment-page-1/#comment-61180</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/#comment-61180</guid>
		<description>Good. I like this measure. For years I&#039;ve wished there was mandatory spay/neuter laws. Too many people are irresponsible pet owners and too many dogs/cats go unwanted in shelters.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. I like this measure. For years I&#8217;ve wished there was mandatory spay/neuter laws. Too many people are irresponsible pet owners and too many dogs/cats go unwanted in shelters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iluvhatemail</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/comment-page-1/#comment-61179</link>
		<dc:creator>iluvhatemail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/#comment-61179</guid>
		<description>Pathetic.

2nd Largest city in America and not a single decent leader. I cant wait to get rid of Tony. He&#039;s only good for having affairs, stumping for hill-dog, and trying to raise taxes by &quot;reducing&quot; them. Must be nice to be king.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pathetic.</p>
<p>2nd Largest city in America and not a single decent leader. I cant wait to get rid of Tony. He&#8217;s only good for having affairs, stumping for hill-dog, and trying to raise taxes by &#8220;reducing&#8221; them. Must be nice to be king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim winstead</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/comment-page-1/#comment-61178</link>
		<dc:creator>jim winstead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2008/02/01/city-council-takes-action/#comment-61178</guid>
		<description>maybe they can get back to voting on resolutions about ending the war in iraq.

why four months? some of the reading i&#039;ve done on neutering of dogs suggests that the commonly recommended age is six months.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe they can get back to voting on resolutions about ending the war in iraq.</p>
<p>why four months? some of the reading i&#8217;ve done on neutering of dogs suggests that the commonly recommended age is six months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

