Offensive Mural Defacement [pt II]
8:57 pm in Uncategorized by Ms. Banneker
After publishing this article on the demise of L.A. Freeway Kids, a rousing debate arose on the comments board. Good!
As a follow-up, I now present “Does MLK dream of 40s?”
When I drive to work everyday, I avoid the 105-110 interchange by heading north on Broadway. While stopped at the light at 95th, I noticed a liquor store on the corner with a really neat-o mural on the side. On the western end, MLK; on the eastern end, Tupac.
The mural, as you can see, was originally painted in 2004. Clearly a mural of this magnitude was done with the owner’s permission.
But here is the real question: Which is more offensive?
(a) The discussion on whether graffiti can be art, or whether tagging can/not be considered legitimate;
(b) The tagging which has been thrown up over the mural; or
(c) The fact that MLK looks like he’s dreaming of ice cold beer and wine?

We wrapped up yesterday’s Swervesperience with the screening of Australian filmmaker Mike Hill’s
Sitting in the Barnsdall Theatre waiting for Aaron Rose’s Beautiful Losers to start. Barely had time to scope out the events outside, but from the little I saw it looks like it’s going to be awesome. If you were on the fence about whether or not to come, get your ass over here. I’m pretty sure you won’t regret it.
Today is the start of 



Recent Comments