<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top LA Legends #22: Scientology&#8217;s L. Ron Hubbard was a Satanist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogging.la/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogging.la/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/</link>
	<description>Lizard people dude. Seriously.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Love</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/comment-page-1/#comment-29008</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/#comment-29008</guid>
		<description>If Hubbard was a satanist his pre-scientology writings do not give the least hint of it or any other leanings towards mysticism. Indeed, he seems to have been a material rationalist. If Hubbard showed interest in Crowley, I am confident it was Crowley&#039;s ability to maintain a cult that interested him, not his supposed cosmology.

Issac Asimov devotes a few pages to origins of Scientology in his book and in its initial form, Scientology was just a health gadget scam. Hubbard only claimed religious status after the IRS busted him. The most sacred text of Scientology are plagiarized from a series of science-fiction stories published in the mid to late 40&#039;s in the pulps. Hubbard most likely cobbled the &quot;religious&quot; aspects of Scientology together in a hurry in order to create a tax dodge.

A bigger influence on Hubbard was the Communist of America whom Hubbard got to observe rather closely during the &#039;30&#039;s and &#039;40&#039;s in LA. The Scientologist practice of targeting celebrities, for example, is lifted from the communist playbook.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Hubbard was a satanist his pre-scientology writings do not give the least hint of it or any other leanings towards mysticism. Indeed, he seems to have been a material rationalist. If Hubbard showed interest in Crowley, I am confident it was Crowley&#8217;s ability to maintain a cult that interested him, not his supposed cosmology.</p>
<p>Issac Asimov devotes a few pages to origins of Scientology in his book and in its initial form, Scientology was just a health gadget scam. Hubbard only claimed religious status after the IRS busted him. The most sacred text of Scientology are plagiarized from a series of science-fiction stories published in the mid to late 40&#8242;s in the pulps. Hubbard most likely cobbled the &#8220;religious&#8221; aspects of Scientology together in a hurry in order to create a tax dodge.</p>
<p>A bigger influence on Hubbard was the Communist of America whom Hubbard got to observe rather closely during the &#8217;30&#8242;s and &#8217;40&#8242;s in LA. The Scientologist practice of targeting celebrities, for example, is lifted from the communist playbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: la guy</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/comment-page-1/#comment-29007</link>
		<dc:creator>la guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/#comment-29007</guid>
		<description>Posted by: &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Oliver Haddo&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Clever.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by: <b><i>Oliver Haddo</i></b></p>
<p>Clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Haddo</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/comment-page-1/#comment-29006</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Haddo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/#comment-29006</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re saying the proof Hubbard wasn&#039;t a Satanist is that ALEISTER CROWLEY wasn&#039;t a Satanist?  This is completely incoherent; maybe you (and Mickey Kaus who linked to it) ought to read the bio of Jack Parsons, including the whole bit where Parsons, Hubbard and Marjorie Cameron tried to give birth to the anti-Christ, following Crowley&#039;s writings (which bothered him no end), and then tell me what exactly the definition of a Satanist is-- if NOT them.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re saying the proof Hubbard wasn&#8217;t a Satanist is that ALEISTER CROWLEY wasn&#8217;t a Satanist?  This is completely incoherent; maybe you (and Mickey Kaus who linked to it) ought to read the bio of Jack Parsons, including the whole bit where Parsons, Hubbard and Marjorie Cameron tried to give birth to the anti-Christ, following Crowley&#8217;s writings (which bothered him no end), and then tell me what exactly the definition of a Satanist is&#8211; if NOT them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: havemycake</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/comment-page-1/#comment-29005</link>
		<dc:creator>havemycake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/#comment-29005</guid>
		<description>no bet with Sun Myung Moon (of the famous Moonies, whom old WB&#039;s Survival of the Richest referred to as a &quot;religious empire&quot;) to see who could make the most money off of creating a religion? regardless, scientologists are much creepy than i originally thought, after having so much first-hand experience with them...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no bet with Sun Myung Moon (of the famous Moonies, whom old WB&#8217;s Survival of the Richest referred to as a &#8220;religious empire&#8221;) to see who could make the most money off of creating a religion? regardless, scientologists are much creepy than i originally thought, after having so much first-hand experience with them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrhooks</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/comment-page-1/#comment-29004</link>
		<dc:creator>mrhooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/#comment-29004</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I heard about the bet too, but in the version I heard, it was a bar bet with Robert Heinlein.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I heard about the bet too, but in the version I heard, it was a bar bet with Robert Heinlein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruth666</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/comment-page-1/#comment-29003</link>
		<dc:creator>ruth666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/#comment-29003</guid>
		<description>It was started as a bet with a bunch of science fiction writers.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was started as a bet with a bunch of science fiction writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5000!</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/comment-page-1/#comment-29002</link>
		<dc:creator>5000!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/03/05/top-la-legends-22-scientologys-l-ron-hubbard-was-a-satanist/#comment-29002</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d always heard it was started as the result of a bet with Carl Sagan. I think that sounds like more fun.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d always heard it was started as the result of a bet with Carl Sagan. I think that sounds like more fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

