<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fred Brito: Back In the Saddle Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/</link>
	<description>Lizard people dude. Seriously.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrhooks</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28906</link>
		<dc:creator>mrhooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/#comment-28906</guid>
		<description>Actually, it would be libel, not slander.  Any real journalist or publishing company would know the difference.

Not to mention your spelling and grammar are quite poor for a journalist...or should that be &quot;journalist,&quot; L&amp;M?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it would be libel, not slander.  Any real journalist or publishing company would know the difference.</p>
<p>Not to mention your spelling and grammar are quite poor for a journalist&#8230;or should that be &#8220;journalist,&#8221; L&amp;M?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cd</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28905</link>
		<dc:creator>cd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/#comment-28905</guid>
		<description>Uh - are any of the anti-David comments here from anyone other than the nutball subject of the original post?  &#039;Cause it seems like they are all written with remarkably similar tone and language.  And nutty goodness. David - anymore IP search gems?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh &#8211; are any of the anti-David comments here from anyone other than the nutball subject of the original post?  &#8216;Cause it seems like they are all written with remarkably similar tone and language.  And nutty goodness. David &#8211; anymore IP search gems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L&#38;M Publishing</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28904</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#38;M Publishing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 03:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/#comment-28904</guid>
		<description>Take a look at L. A. Observer.  It all started with you. Take a look at NELA group on Yahoo.  It all started with you.  Take a look at The Round Up at NMSU, that also started with you.  Now you have a hailstorm against my client Fred Brito.  What was published in the newspaper is not entirely true, you must remember that.  The only thing that I think you can place your bets on is DATELINE NBC.  I am sure they are very thorough unlike you.  Our book will be very thorough, unlike you.  You continue to take cheap shots and I assure you... you will not be happy should you continue to step on people.  Let DATELINE do their story.  It will be out soon enough.  Your trying to grasp the brass ring before them.  It will be futile.  You don&#039;t have enough money.

As for L&amp;M Publishing... it is our own private company.  We do not need to advertise.  We have enough business and three best sellers.  We do not need to prove anything to you.  Just know that you have opened Pandora&#039;s box.  Now you will have to deal with it.  We use all the software that we can to keep people like you away, and we will continue to do so.

The choice is yours.

L&amp;M Publishing
2/19/07 - Phoenix, AZ.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at L. A. Observer.  It all started with you. Take a look at NELA group on Yahoo.  It all started with you.  Take a look at The Round Up at NMSU, that also started with you.  Now you have a hailstorm against my client Fred Brito.  What was published in the newspaper is not entirely true, you must remember that.  The only thing that I think you can place your bets on is DATELINE NBC.  I am sure they are very thorough unlike you.  Our book will be very thorough, unlike you.  You continue to take cheap shots and I assure you&#8230; you will not be happy should you continue to step on people.  Let DATELINE do their story.  It will be out soon enough.  Your trying to grasp the brass ring before them.  It will be futile.  You don&#8217;t have enough money.</p>
<p>As for L&amp;M Publishing&#8230; it is our own private company.  We do not need to advertise.  We have enough business and three best sellers.  We do not need to prove anything to you.  Just know that you have opened Pandora&#8217;s box.  Now you will have to deal with it.  We use all the software that we can to keep people like you away, and we will continue to do so.</p>
<p>The choice is yours.</p>
<p>L&amp;M Publishing<br />
2/19/07 &#8211; Phoenix, AZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Markland</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28903</link>
		<dc:creator>David Markland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/#comment-28903</guid>
		<description>Considering that &quot;L&amp;M Publishing&quot; is writing from an email address through Anonymizer, I have no reason to believe or consider anything in the above comment is true. Additionally, a &quot;responsible journalist&quot;, as you claim to be, would attach their name to what they write, not a &quot;publishing company&quot; that I can&#039;t find a single reference for.

Additionally, I never said that Fred&#039;s current activities are illegal, and in fact pointed this. Most of the facts in this piece also come from the same LA Times article that Fred has boasted about his participation in.

If, indeed, I have written anything inaccurate, please bring it up specifically.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that &#8220;L&amp;M Publishing&#8221; is writing from an email address through Anonymizer, I have no reason to believe or consider anything in the above comment is true. Additionally, a &#8220;responsible journalist&#8221;, as you claim to be, would attach their name to what they write, not a &#8220;publishing company&#8221; that I can&#8217;t find a single reference for.</p>
<p>Additionally, I never said that Fred&#8217;s current activities are illegal, and in fact pointed this. Most of the facts in this piece also come from the same LA Times article that Fred has boasted about his participation in.</p>
<p>If, indeed, I have written anything inaccurate, please bring it up specifically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L&#38;M PUBLISHING</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28902</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#38;M PUBLISHING</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/#comment-28902</guid>
		<description>I live in Phoenix Arizona and my husband and I are writing his life story.  Due out in 2008.

You are doing yourself a disservice by stating facts that are not correct.  Had you completed and thorough investigation into the facts as we have, you will see that the Fred Brito that you know only through news clippings and here say is by far different that the one that you will see on DATELINE NBC.

I am not going to attempt to change your mind here, however I will indicate to you that you are largely mistaken in your information and facts.

I am sitting here with him at this moment.  We can only chuckle at your lack of professionalism and failure to investigate the facts.  You rely are warmed over facts from blog to blog and write as if it is all-true.  How wrong is that?  Your thirst to eat people up and keep people down is your largest character flaw. It shows your own lack of self worth, self esteem, and for that I am sorry for you.

You do not know Fred Brito as we do.  We have spent over two years with him and we have only finished 209 pages, and we are not half way through.  This is a complex story, and all of our facts are verified and verified yet again.  All that we write, as with DATELINE NBC has to be a proven fact, or we are sued.  This is responsible journalism.  Your brand of journalism can be found on any street corner.  You are not a journalist, at least not one with any kind of respect for the art.

You really think that people cannot read between your lines and see clearly how you ache to destroy people.   That is what you do best.  Destroy people and you have no sense of morals or values.

We have been in New Mexico with Fred on and off for a long time.  We are working diligently on his story, and none of your facts is accurate.  It is all warmed over news from two years ago.  The least you can do is discover new facts that are true and accurate.

Your latest story about Fred and the University is a dishonest attempt to again hammer him.  For the record.... Fred has never been arrested or accused of anything at the university and he is not associated in any way with the university.  You state that he used fraudulent credentials.  All wrong.  Can you prove it?  Can you make some telephone calls and prove it?  You have just dug yourself a hole, as you have blasted all over the world facts that are not true, this is called Defamation and Slander.  You cannot prove any of what you have stated, and that is a crime.  This is the Internet.  There are laws.  And frankly, you have violated Fred&#039;s rights.  Yet, you have the audacity to sit there and write on and on facts that are not true.  We will see.  Stay tuned.

Why not you pick up the phone and call him?  His number is all over the Internet.  I can tell you that he has done more for this City than you can ever dream up.  He is working on redemption, and he is doing a fine job.  I admire his tenacity, and courage to do all that he can to tell the truth about his story.  I think you will be surprised once DATELINE comes out.  You might think twice at labeling him many of the names that you have called him.

As for his name, it has been changed legally.  It is not an alias.  Ask to see the court documents.  I have them, and you too should investigate and get them as I have.  That is responsible journalism.  You see you know nothing of Fred Brito.  You know only what you and your community of leeches talk about when you are seeking blood to suck out of others.  Take a deep look in the mirror.  Go ahead.... see what you have become.  A vulture that spends hours looking for prey.  Yet, you call yourself a journalist.  Shame on you.

Go ahead, pick up of the phone and call Fred Brito.  Maybe it will be the first time that you will rise to the level of human being... muchless a man.

L&amp;M Publishing,
Phoenix, AZ.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Phoenix Arizona and my husband and I are writing his life story.  Due out in 2008.</p>
<p>You are doing yourself a disservice by stating facts that are not correct.  Had you completed and thorough investigation into the facts as we have, you will see that the Fred Brito that you know only through news clippings and here say is by far different that the one that you will see on DATELINE NBC.</p>
<p>I am not going to attempt to change your mind here, however I will indicate to you that you are largely mistaken in your information and facts.</p>
<p>I am sitting here with him at this moment.  We can only chuckle at your lack of professionalism and failure to investigate the facts.  You rely are warmed over facts from blog to blog and write as if it is all-true.  How wrong is that?  Your thirst to eat people up and keep people down is your largest character flaw. It shows your own lack of self worth, self esteem, and for that I am sorry for you.</p>
<p>You do not know Fred Brito as we do.  We have spent over two years with him and we have only finished 209 pages, and we are not half way through.  This is a complex story, and all of our facts are verified and verified yet again.  All that we write, as with DATELINE NBC has to be a proven fact, or we are sued.  This is responsible journalism.  Your brand of journalism can be found on any street corner.  You are not a journalist, at least not one with any kind of respect for the art.</p>
<p>You really think that people cannot read between your lines and see clearly how you ache to destroy people.   That is what you do best.  Destroy people and you have no sense of morals or values.</p>
<p>We have been in New Mexico with Fred on and off for a long time.  We are working diligently on his story, and none of your facts is accurate.  It is all warmed over news from two years ago.  The least you can do is discover new facts that are true and accurate.</p>
<p>Your latest story about Fred and the University is a dishonest attempt to again hammer him.  For the record&#8230;. Fred has never been arrested or accused of anything at the university and he is not associated in any way with the university.  You state that he used fraudulent credentials.  All wrong.  Can you prove it?  Can you make some telephone calls and prove it?  You have just dug yourself a hole, as you have blasted all over the world facts that are not true, this is called Defamation and Slander.  You cannot prove any of what you have stated, and that is a crime.  This is the Internet.  There are laws.  And frankly, you have violated Fred&#8217;s rights.  Yet, you have the audacity to sit there and write on and on facts that are not true.  We will see.  Stay tuned.</p>
<p>Why not you pick up the phone and call him?  His number is all over the Internet.  I can tell you that he has done more for this City than you can ever dream up.  He is working on redemption, and he is doing a fine job.  I admire his tenacity, and courage to do all that he can to tell the truth about his story.  I think you will be surprised once DATELINE comes out.  You might think twice at labeling him many of the names that you have called him.</p>
<p>As for his name, it has been changed legally.  It is not an alias.  Ask to see the court documents.  I have them, and you too should investigate and get them as I have.  That is responsible journalism.  You see you know nothing of Fred Brito.  You know only what you and your community of leeches talk about when you are seeking blood to suck out of others.  Take a deep look in the mirror.  Go ahead&#8230;. see what you have become.  A vulture that spends hours looking for prey.  Yet, you call yourself a journalist.  Shame on you.</p>
<p>Go ahead, pick up of the phone and call Fred Brito.  Maybe it will be the first time that you will rise to the level of human being&#8230; muchless a man.</p>
<p>L&amp;M Publishing,<br />
Phoenix, AZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Markland</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28901</link>
		<dc:creator>David Markland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/#comment-28901</guid>
		<description>Ken:

If its a story worth looking into, leave it anonymously by clicking on &quot;send a story&quot;, or emailing me directly:
unsomnambulist at gmail dot com.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken:</p>
<p>If its a story worth looking into, leave it anonymously by clicking on &#8220;send a story&#8221;, or emailing me directly:<br />
unsomnambulist at gmail dot com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Camp</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28900</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/#comment-28900</guid>
		<description>David, a postscript here.

Three years ago a Lincoln Heights Neighborhood Council board member and his wife placed a dead animal in my mailbox due to a disagreement we had concerning the AIDS Wall in Lincoln Park.  (They were opposed, I was in favor of.)  This same couple also falsely accused me of stalking them, and they hired Scott Lively, extremist right wing &quot;Christian&quot; nutball lawyer to terrorize the Lincoln Heights Neighborhood Council treasurer with theats of a  lawsuit simply because he supported the AIDS Wall.

This is the type of over-the-top behavior I am concerned about, not whether someone embezzled or portrayed a priest or lied on their resume.  People need to reassess their priorities.

As for the dead-animal-in-the-mailbox routine, the perpetrators are prominent members of Sacred Heart Church in Lincoln Heights.  Ask anybody there:  they know who this evil couple are.  Imagine:  who would kill a defenseless animal just to intimidate a political opponent?  What kind of monsters would do that?

Ken Camp, Los Angeles

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, a postscript here.</p>
<p>Three years ago a Lincoln Heights Neighborhood Council board member and his wife placed a dead animal in my mailbox due to a disagreement we had concerning the AIDS Wall in Lincoln Park.  (They were opposed, I was in favor of.)  This same couple also falsely accused me of stalking them, and they hired Scott Lively, extremist right wing &#8220;Christian&#8221; nutball lawyer to terrorize the Lincoln Heights Neighborhood Council treasurer with theats of a  lawsuit simply because he supported the AIDS Wall.</p>
<p>This is the type of over-the-top behavior I am concerned about, not whether someone embezzled or portrayed a priest or lied on their resume.  People need to reassess their priorities.</p>
<p>As for the dead-animal-in-the-mailbox routine, the perpetrators are prominent members of Sacred Heart Church in Lincoln Heights.  Ask anybody there:  they know who this evil couple are.  Imagine:  who would kill a defenseless animal just to intimidate a political opponent?  What kind of monsters would do that?</p>
<p>Ken Camp, Los Angeles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Camp</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28899</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/#comment-28899</guid>
		<description>David, your assertions regarding my motives are a bit unreal.  I am not saying that people should not warn others of Fred or that it is okay to lie on your resume (ahem, about half of L.A. just got busted for that one!).  But I am concerned when people allow themselves to be manipulated by sleaze-mongerers into a mass hysteria-type consciousness in which they are either drooling or wetting their pants.  It would be unwise to goad me into naming the convicted murderer who is Chair of a local Northeast L.A. neighborhood council . . . because he might kill me!  LOL   Ask Councilman Ed Reyes or anyone in his office who this convicted murderer-turned-council president is.  They know too well who he is.

Ken Camp, Los Angeles

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, your assertions regarding my motives are a bit unreal.  I am not saying that people should not warn others of Fred or that it is okay to lie on your resume (ahem, about half of L.A. just got busted for that one!).  But I am concerned when people allow themselves to be manipulated by sleaze-mongerers into a mass hysteria-type consciousness in which they are either drooling or wetting their pants.  It would be unwise to goad me into naming the convicted murderer who is Chair of a local Northeast L.A. neighborhood council . . . because he might kill me!  LOL   Ask Councilman Ed Reyes or anyone in his office who this convicted murderer-turned-council president is.  They know too well who he is.</p>
<p>Ken Camp, Los Angeles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NAME WITHHELD, Glendale, CA</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28898</link>
		<dc:creator>NAME WITHHELD, Glendale, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/#comment-28898</guid>
		<description>David Markland, you sure have balls.  You know me, and I know you, but you are as phony as they come. To think that you are chasing after this brito guy is so like you, yet in your personal life you are a liar and a thief.  I stayed over your house a few years back after you got me drunk and tried to have sex with me.  You are the crook if anyone ever was. Plus you stole my watch and then had the nerve to deny it.  I might have been drunk, but you are a sick bastard.  Taking avantage of drunk people for your own sexual pleasure is a lot worse than this brito.  People should be watching YOU.  YOU are the freak.  You have balls that is all I can say.  Big F***** balls. You stupid bastard.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Markland, you sure have balls.  You know me, and I know you, but you are as phony as they come. To think that you are chasing after this brito guy is so like you, yet in your personal life you are a liar and a thief.  I stayed over your house a few years back after you got me drunk and tried to have sex with me.  You are the crook if anyone ever was. Plus you stole my watch and then had the nerve to deny it.  I might have been drunk, but you are a sick bastard.  Taking avantage of drunk people for your own sexual pleasure is a lot worse than this brito.  People should be watching YOU.  YOU are the freak.  You have balls that is all I can say.  Big F***** balls. You stupid bastard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Markland</title>
		<link>http://blogging.la/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28897</link>
		<dc:creator>David Markland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2007/02/18/fred-brito-back-in-the-saddle-again/#comment-28897</guid>
		<description>Ken, I appreciate your comment but your accusation of stalking is unfounded. If the Prez of the Northeast LA NC is a convicted murderer, please tell us more... sounds interesting.
But you also fail to not that Brito&#039;s most recent conviction of embezzlement was only a handful of years ago. He may be interesting, funny, and not evil, but I don&#039;t understand how you can argue that people shouldn&#039;t be warned by him. Unless you&#039;re rooting for him to steal money for somebody else. At the very least, you seem to support his argument that its okay to lie on your resume.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, I appreciate your comment but your accusation of stalking is unfounded. If the Prez of the Northeast LA NC is a convicted murderer, please tell us more&#8230; sounds interesting.<br />
But you also fail to not that Brito&#8217;s most recent conviction of embezzlement was only a handful of years ago. He may be interesting, funny, and not evil, but I don&#8217;t understand how you can argue that people shouldn&#8217;t be warned by him. Unless you&#8217;re rooting for him to steal money for somebody else. At the very least, you seem to support his argument that its okay to lie on your resume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

